Georgia Secretary of State and State Election Board Changed Absentee Ballot Signature Verification and Added Drop Boxes Without State Legislature’s Approval

 

As in-person early voting began Monday for the January 5 run off election for two U.S. Senate seats in Georgia, significant changes for absentee ballot signature verification and drop boxes put into place by Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and the State Election Board ahead of the November 3 presidential election without the state legislature’s approval are still in place.

Local county registrars began mailing approved absentee ballots to voters for the January 5 run off elections more than three weeks ago on November 18, according to Georgia’s election calendar.

Neither (1) the use of drop boxes for voters to deposit absentee ballots nor (2) the current method of absentee ballot signature verification have been authorized by the Georgia General Assembly.

(1) The use of drop boxes for voters to deposit absentee ballots has not been authorized by the Georgia General Assembly

Mail or personal delivery are the only two ways that Georgia lawmakers have clearly specified in O.C.G.A. 21-2-385 that electors are to get their absentee ballots to the registrar or absentee ballot clerk.

There are no provisions in the current Georgia code made by state legislators – who have the sole constitutional responsibility for setting election procedures as stated in Article II Section I, Paragraph I of the Constitution of the State of Georgia – for drop boxes or any other manner in which absentee ballots can be returned to the registrar other than mail or in-person delivery.

O.C.G.A. 21-2-382 explicitly addresses “Additional sites as additional registrar’s office or place of registration for absentee ballots.”

That section of Georgia law allows for the registrar to establish additional sites “for the purpose of receiving absentee ballots.”

The law specifies that any additional sites must be “a branch of the county courthouse, a courthouse annex, a government service center providing general government services, another government building generally accessible to the public.”  The law extends the establishment of additional sites by the registrar to locations used as an election day polling place, even if that location is not a government building.

Shortly after Gov. Kemp declared a public health emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and in advance of the June primary, Secretary Raffensperger and the State Election Board voted unanimously at their April 15, 2020 special-called meeting to adopt Election Code Emergency Rule number 183-1-14-0.8-.14. to Secure Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes “exactly as written” and presented to the board at the meeting by Secretary of State General Counsel Ryan Germany:

V. EMERGENCY RULE: SECURE ABSENTEE BALOT (sic) DROP BOXES

Mr. Germany presented and explained the emergency rule to the Board and asked the Board to adopt the rule as written. Matthew Mashburn made a motion to adopt the emergency rule as written. David Worley seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously with a Board vote of 4-0.

Under Georgia law, emergency rules adopted by any state agency or regulatory body automatically expire 120 days after their adoption(see § 50-13-4-b).

Subsequently, the State Election Board met on July 1 and unanimously voted to amend and extend Election Code Emergency Rule number 183-1-14-0.8-.14. for an additional 120 days, meaning the rule was set to expire on October 28, five days before the November 3 general election:

Mr. Germany presented and explained the proposed amended emergency rules to the Board and asked the Board to adopt the rules. The Board unanimously voted to adopt the amendments to the emergency rules as written.

A subsequent review of the agenda and meeting summaries of all the meetings of the State Election Board between July 1, 2020 and Election Day November 3, 2020 by The Georgia Star News indicates that the Board appears to not have undertaken consideration of or a vote on extending Election Code Emergency Rule number 183-13-0.8-14. subsequent to its apparent expiration on October 28, 2020.

On November 23, the State Election Board met again and, according to press reports, voted unanimously to extend Election Code Emergency Rule number 183-13-0.8-14. A written transcript of the minutes of that meeting has not been made available at the State Election Board website, but you can listen to an audio recording of that one hour and 27 minute meeting here.

The rule usurps Georgia’s legislature by giving powers to county registrars not permitted in state law.

The first paragraph of the Raffensperger/State Election Board rule reads, “County registrars are authorized to establish one or more drop box locations as a means for absentee by mail electors to deliver their ballots to the county registrars.”

(2) The current method of absentee ballot signature verification has not been authorized by the Georgia General Assembly

Another change to absentee ballot procedures instituted by Raffensperger and the State Election Board without legislative approval came about as the result of a November 2019 lawsuit brought by the Democratic Party of Georgia (DPG) against Raffensperger, the State Election Board, and the Gwinnett County Board of Registration and Elections.

DPG’s legal complaint centered on a few points relative to absentee ballots:

– when a timely-submitted absentee ballot is rejected by the registrar for signature issues in accordance with O.C.G.A. 21-2-386, the “promptly notify” provision of the statute does not adequately address the method or timing of such notification by the registrar to the absentee voter

– the Gwinnett County absentee ballot envelope has a confusing layout and illegible font size, caused primarily by the federally mandated English/Spanish bi-lingual verbiage to accommodate the high percentage of Hispanic and Latino residents of the county

The remedy that DPG sought from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia was two-fold:

– require that the Georgia Secretary of State and the State Election Board instruct county election officials to notify voters of signature issues with their absentee ballots by phone, email and/or text message within one day of receiving the absentee ballot

– prevent the Gwinnett Board from creating, preparing and distributing absentee ballot envelopes with a confusing, illegible design

Since DPG’s requests seem fairly reasonable and straightforward, it is unclear why Raffensperger went above and beyond the requested relief by agreeing to the March 2020 Compromise Settlement Agreement and Release.

In the Compromise Settlement, Raffensperger and the State Election Board agreed and subsequently changed Rule 183-1-14-.13 regarding Prompt Notification of Absentee Ballot Rejection.

The Compromise Settlement also required that Raffensperger, “in his official capacity as Secretary of State,” issue an Official Election Bulletin regarding the procedure for reviewing signatures on absentee ballot envelopes by county election officials.

Raffensperger’s subsequent Official Election Bulletin required that county registrars and absentee ballot clerks comparing signatures on the absentee ballot mailing envelope to the voter’s registration card seek review from two other registrars before rejecting the ballot.  An absentee ballot could not be rejected unless a majority of the three registrars agreed that the signature does not match any of the voter’s signatures on file.

The review and agreement by two other registrars materially changed Georgia law, as set out in O.C.G.A. 21-2-386(a)(1)(C), which requires review by only one individual and makes it more difficult to challenge defective signatures.

It is also curious that this mandate comes by way of an Official Election Bulletin from Raffensperger, rather than a rule change approved by the State Election Board, which is done through public meetings, adoption through a majority vote and publication of the meeting minutes and the rules.

By comparison, Official Election Bulletins do not get the public hearing that State Election Board Rules do, and the Secretary of State’s website includes no obvious record of the Official Election Bulletins that Raffensperger has issued.

Clearly, that is not the case when it comes to requiring signature review on the absentee ballot exterior envelope by three individuals and majority agreement before a rejection, when the law calls for review and rejection by only the registrar or clerk.

In August 2020, Raffensperger and the State Election Board went further to undermine the signature verification process.

Through Emergency Rule 183-1-14-0.10-.16 Raffensperger and the State Election Board allowed applications for absentee ballots to be submitted on-line.  As such, there was no requirement for the direct presentation of the applicant’s signature for verification and issuance of an absentee ballot.

Raffensperger also agreed in paragraph 4 of the Compromise Settlement to “consider in good faith providing county registrars and absentee ballot clerks with additional guidance and training materials to follow when comparing voters’ signatures that will be drafted by the Political Party Committees’ handwriting and signature review expert.”

The “Political Party Committees,” as defined in the Compromise Settlement are the Democratic Party of Georgia and two other Democratic organizations.

Shockingly, this leaves the training for absentee ballot signatures to Democrat experts.

Under the auspices of protecting the health of Georgia voters while “also upholding the integrity of the vote,” Raffensperger, “more than ever,” encouraged Georgians to vote with a mail-in absentee ballot

To assist in that goal, Raffensperger mailed 6.9 million absentee ballot request forms to every Georgia voter, according to a statement issued by the Secretary of State’s office.

This, while the DPG who named him in the lawsuit, said in their legal complaint that in recent elections, “absentee voters have disproportionately voted for Democratic candidates.”

The November 3, 2020, presidential election results certified by Raffensperger and Governor Brian Kemp had Democratic candidate Joe Biden ahead of President Donald Trump by less than 12,000 votes out of 5 million votes cast, of which 1.3 million were fraud-prone absentee ballots.

The state of Texas alleged in a lawsuit, filed with the U.S. Supreme Court and supported by 18 Republican attorneys general, that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger materially changed the absentee ballot signature verification process in the months leading up to the November 3, 2020 general election.  The Supreme Court rejected the lawsuit, not on merit, but for Texas’s lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.

Laura Baigert is a senior reporter at The Tennessee Star and The Star News Network.
Photo “People Voting” by Phil Roeder. CC BY 2.0.

 

 

 

 

Related posts

15 Thoughts to “Georgia Secretary of State and State Election Board Changed Absentee Ballot Signature Verification and Added Drop Boxes Without State Legislature’s Approval”

  1. […] absentee ballots counted (out of 5 million whole forged), regardless of a Georgia Star Information report {that a} new absentee poll signature verification course of launched by Raffensperger in an […]

  2. […] on the 1.3 absentee ballots counted (out of 5 million total cast), despite a Georgia Star News report that a new absentee ballot signature verification process introduced by Raffensperger in an […]

  3. […] on the 1.3 absentee ballots counted (out of 5 million total cast), despite a Georgia Star News report that a new absentee ballot signature verification process introduced by Raffensperger in an […]

  4. […] on the 1.3 absentee ballots counted (out of 5 million total cast), despite a Georgia Star News report that a new absentee ballot signature verification process introduced by Raffensperger in an […]

  5. […] on the 1.3 absentee ballots counted (out of 5 million total cast), despite a Georgia Star News report that a new absentee ballot signature verification process introduced by Raffensperger in an […]

  6. […] the required approval from Georgia’s legislature, The Georgia Star News reported, the State Election Board established Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14 “Secure Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes” […]

  7. Joe Dozer

    The Georgia State Legislature should just send out teams with baseball bats to just rip out those boxes. The US Supreme Court just shredded the Constitution and said that “anything goes”. So just do it and if anyone gets in your way, knock their heads into the cheap seats!

  8. […] Georgia law that allowed drop boxes for the Nov 3 election expired 5 days before the election. […]

  9. […] the required approval from Georgia’s legislature, The Georgia Star News reported, the State Election Board established Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14 “Secure Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes” […]

  10. […] the required approval from Georgia’s legislature, The Georgia Star News reported, the State Election Board established Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14 “Secure Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes” […]

  11. […] the required approval from Georgia’s legislature, The Georgia Star News reported, the State Election Board established Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14 “Secure Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes” […]

  12. Tarc

    The only way that right-wingers can ever hope to win an election is to try to thwart the right to vote in as many urban centers as possible.

    35 days, boy, til President Biden.

  13. Robert Barker

    It’s worse than this article notes…
    1. GA law requires that absentee ballots be opened after 7pm on Election Day. With a seven day notice period, county officials can start opening as early as 7am on Election Day.
    The SoS regulations permit opening absentee ballots more than three weeks before election day. Persons coming to the polls and finding they have already voted “absentee” have no recourse under the SoS regulations.
    2. The new GA rules permit “dropboxes” even though GA law requires that an absentee ballot be personally delivered by the voter (or a specified type of close relative designee) or mailed. Drop boxes permit unlawful ballot harvesting — persons collecting ballots and dropping them off en masse.
    3. GA law requires that a voter must “request” an absentee ballot application. The State sent request forms out to all voters.
    4. GA law requires that absentee ballot requests be made no more than 180 days in advance of an election. The Secretary allowed requests to be made prior to that date by more than 300,000 people.
    5. GA law states that a single registrar shall reject an absentee ballot if there is a signature mis-match. As you note, the consent decree now famously changed that to require a “committee of three” and made it more difficult for signature verification to occur. As a result, ballots rejected due to signature mismatch fell by more than 80% — it is easy to believe that in some counties, all signature verification was suspended. Many counties rejected no ballots for lack of a signature match.
    6, The new rules are making it difficult to monitor the absentee ballot and early voting processes. A Republican supervisor of elections has just banned the entire slate of poll watchers in a large urban county, and requested that any poll workers be committed to 12 hour shifts over the holidays.
    7. GA law prohibits cameras when a voter is voting. That is well and good (although other states permit citizens to carry cameras and capture themselves voting, etc.), but there is no reason to ban cameras when tabulation is going on. The SoS regulations ban cameras and require poll watchers to turn in their cell phones. There is no reason for this regulation other than to spare the elected officials from embarrassing exposure.
    8. The First Amendment gives citizens the right to speak about their government The SoS regulations ban any communication by a poll watcher about what he or she sees in the watching process. This is an unconstitutional gag order.
    9. The President has also challenged the use of mobile precincts not authorized by state law and felony voting.

  14. J

    You should mention that L Lin Wood’s lawsuit docketed at SCOTUS is over this very issue. He is a GA voter and is case already went through the lower courts.

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-799.html

Comments